Adapted from:The Extraordinary Leader, John H. Zenger & JosephFolkman

One of the most useful frameworks by which to understand how people contribute in their careers is the four stages model, originally developed by Gene Dalton and Paul Thompson. This model describes four stages of career growth through which people may move. In many cases people become locked into one stage because they do not possess the necessary skills and behaviour to move forward. In other cases people stay at a particular stage because it fits their needs and aptitudes. The four stages are:

  • Stage I: depending on others

  • Stage II: contributing independently

  • Stage III: contributing through others

  • Stage IV: leading through vision

Stage I.

The first stage of careers has been described as depending on others. In Stage I, people willingly accept direction from others. People in Stage I demonstrate some competency on a portion of a larger project but tend to focus on performing detailed and routine tasks. Stage I individuals show some directed creativity and can be depended on to deliver on time and on budget. Stage I is an important career step. It is that time when people learn the ropes and gain an in-depth understanding of technology and organisational dynamics. Most individuals spend limited time in Stage I at the beginning of their career or when they take on a new assignment. Because the major psychological focus of Stage I is dependence, no leadership is exhibited in this stage. People in Stage I are led; they do not lead. Research with hundreds of organisations has uncovered that some people never leave Stage I. They continue to rely on others for direction. Other people make a transition from Stage I early in their careers but then, because they are out of date or lack skills, transition back later in their career.

Stage II.

The second stage is contributing independently. This describes a series of behaviours that enable a person to assume responsibility for a definable project, not to rely on a supervisor but, instead, to work autonomously. This person produces significant results, and in so doing, develops greater technical expertise, along with a strong reputation. This person also builds a strong network of personal relationships. This stage of career growth is an absolute gateway to further progression. If people cannot perform well in Stage II positions, they cannot move on successfully to roles in which they will be responsible for a group of people.

Having a proper set of personal capabilities is another way of saying that the excellent leader must have moved successfully through Stage II. Leaders cannot skip this stage; if they do, they pay a price as they move upward in the organisation and then have to go back and acquire skills that should have been acquired earlier in their careers. This is the time when self-confidence must be developed, and trust in one's own perceptions of situations.

Moving too fast through Stage II is also dangerous. In moving too rapidly, people do not develop self-confidence or build credibility with others in the organisation. Our analysis of the research data on leaders shows that effective leaders learned professional skills during this stage of their careers. Without these skills, further progress is severely limited. Leadership in Stage II is sometimes described as personal leadership.

Stage III.

The third stage is about contributing through others, and every effective leader of others is at least in Stage III. Many people who have the title of "Manager," however, are not in Stage III, but remain locked in Stage II, even though they are surrounded by the trappings of a Stage III leader. These are managers who continue to process claim/forms, or design a new part, because it is more comfortable to function as an individual contributor than as a leader. Frequently they will "cherry-pick" the best assignments and compete with their direct reports for recognition and rewards. They are unable or unwilling to leave their comfort zone of being personally productive using some technical tasks.

Stage III behaviour requires people to develop others, to represent the organisation to clients and external groups, and to build strong internal and external networks. Stage III contributors achieve positive results as they work with and through others. They have organisational impact by mentoring others, by heading up a project team, and by taking on responsibility for much more than their own performance. (What this means, of course, is that there are many Stage III people who do not have the words "supervisor," "manager," or "director" in front of their names. The creators of this useful framework by which to understand career growth have done research that shows there to be five times as many people in Stage III who do not have a managerial title as there are those who have a formal role and title.)

Stage IV.

A small number of people move beyond Stage III and become Stage IV leaders. Research shows that only 5 percent of the working population ends up in Stage IV functions. That means, obviously, that 95 percent of everyone working in organisations ends up having perfectly satisfactory careers without moving to Stage IV. First, let's examine what they must accomplish.

Stage IV leaders are that group of individuals in the organisation who:

  • Create the overarching vision for the organisation

  • Define the strategic direction of the organisation

  • Exercise strong influence over the critical decisions that are made

  • Represent the organisation to the outside world, including customers, suppliers, and trade associations

  • Are the antenna to the outside world, collecting information and scanning the horizon for change

  • Shape the culture

  • Allocate resources among competing groups

  • Translate the strategic direction into personal objectives for people

One way to understand the implications of how your contribution is manifested and valued changes as you progress as a leader, is by looking at those competencies that are most critical at different stages of a career.

Five key clusters of Leadership Competency

In the The Extraordinary Leader, Zenger & Folkman describe the results of a research project into what constitutes effective leadership. They examined the performance and characteristics of 26,314 leaders from more than 100 organisations who had been evaluated by 237,123 of their direct reports, managers and peers (i.e. via 360 degree survey).

Their empirical factor analysis of the huge amounts of data collected on leader’s competencies reveals that all vital and differentiating leadership competencies can be grouped into five clusters:

  • Character - the core of all leadership effectiveness.

  • Personal Capability - this describes the intellectual, emotional, and skill makeup of the individual. It includes analytical and problem-solving capabilities, along with the technical competence the person possesses. It requires the ability to create a clear vision and sense of purpose for the organisation.

  • Focus on Results - describes the ability to have impact on the organisation. It means being capable of getting things accomplished.

  • Interpersonal Skills - includes all of the people skills.

  • Leading Organisational Change - the highest expression of leadership involves leadership through change.

Zenger & Folkman’s research established that the requirement for what they described as Character did not change over the course of the journey from a stage I to stage IV contributor. This was a foundation upon which effectiveness in all other domains was built.

Some of the ways Zenger & Folkman defined Character included:

  • Making decisions with the organisation paramount in their mind, versus allowing a personal agenda to influence decisions

  • Keeping commitments that are made

  • Practicing self-development; constantly learning

  • Being receptive to, and specifically asking for, feedback from others

  • Being approachable by everyone

  • Treating everyone consistently and with dignity, regardless of title

  • Trusting people

  • Working collaboratively with others

  • Being tenacious and not giving up because something is difficult

For each individual at each stage, leadership in the other four critical domains looks different, this is the fundamental concept of the four stages of contribution model.

The following tables describe the necessary elements of Personal Capability, Focus of Results, Interpersonal Skills and Leading Organisational Change, as they manifest for Stage II, Stage Ill, and Stage IV leaders.

“Personal Capabilities" for Stages II, III, and IV

 

"Focus on Results" for Stages II, III, and IV

 

"Interpersonal Skills" for Stages II, III, and IV

 

"Leading Organisational Change" for Stages II, III, and IV

Previous
Previous

You can’t change Culture!

Next
Next

Staying Ahead of the Game: Broad Scanning and Global Insights